Bodhisattva vs Arhat

Bodhisattva and Arhat are both concepts in Buddhism, but they have distinct differences.

TABLE OF CONTENT

Bodhisattva is a Sanskrit word that can be translated as “enlightenment being.” It refers to someone who has made a commitment to attain enlightenment not only for themselves but also for the benefit of all sentient beings. A Bodhisattva is someone who is motivated by compassion and seeks to relieve the suffering of others.

The idea of the Bodhisattva is central to Mahayana Buddhism, which emphasizes the importance of altruistic action and the cultivation of compassion. In this tradition, the Bodhisattva is seen as a model of the ideal spiritual practitioner, who seeks to cultivate wisdom and compassion through various practices, such as meditation, altruistic action, and ethical conduct.

Bodhisattva vs Arhat

Arhat, on the other hand, is a Sanskrit word that can be translated as “worthy one.” It refers to someone who has reached enlightenment and has achieved liberation from the cycle of birth and death (samsara). An Arhat is considered to have overcome all ignorance and desire and has achieved a state of permanent peace and freedom from suffering.

Arhats are typically associated with the Theravada tradition of Buddhism, which emphasizes individual spiritual progress and the attainment of personal liberation. According to this tradition, an Arhat has achieved the ultimate goal of Buddhist practice, which is the end of suffering and the attainment of Nirvana.

So to summarize, the main difference between a Bodhisattva and an Arhat is their motivation and focus. A Bodhisattva is focused on the path to enlightenment and is motivated by compassion for all sentient beings. An Arhat, on the other hand, has already reached enlightenment and is focused on their own liberation from suffering.

Updated: February 14, 2023 — 9:38 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *